In 2004, my pals at Blogit suggested I write a novel. I hemmed and hawed over it for a bit, and then decided it sounded doable. I didn’t understand what a mammoth task I had taken on, but I read reams on writing fiction. Still, I made tons of mistakes. The grammar and sentence structure were in place, but I had point of view issues, as well as the habit of including details that didn’t matter.
.
With continued reading and the help of other writers, I improved. I’ll remain forever grateful to the people I met at the online workshop, The Next Big Writer. Workshops are wonderful tools to help writers improve their skills. They can also be dangerous.
.
We all have our ideas as to what good writing is, however, in giving my opinion to other writers I try not to sound as if my views are the only ones that count, and that I have all the answers. Of course, I don’t. I’d be silly to think I have a handle on this art form that tons of people struggle with daily.
.
When I do a review, I mostly concentrate on grammar and sentence structure because that’s where I excel. Half the time, there are things wrong with what I’m reading that I can’t put a name to. In those instances, I may note that I couldn’t put my finger on what I thought was missing, but I still give encouragement to the writer.
.
The last thing I want to do is confuse another writer, but inadvertently, it happens. I was reading Tirz’s blog post, wherein she pointed out that her book relies strongly on voice and that the narrator was unreliable. In my mind, there’s nothing wrong with that. I like a little unpredictability.
.
She also noted, and I’m quoting her here, that people wanted explanations. They want everything to be boxed off and clear and concise. But I don’t think this book will ever be completely normal. But does that mean it won’t be satisfying?
.
My response to the above would be to write, first of all to purge and satisfy herself, and then on the edit, make sure the reader understands what the story is about. If she, as the writer has some sense of where she’s going with the tale, and knows what her character should achieve, then it’s okay to pursue the current path.
.
The facilitator at the workshop I attended always told the group never to ‘write down’ to the reader. Always assume your reader is more intelligent than you, is what he’d say and I try to remember that when I’m tempted to explain the obvious.
.
It sometimes boggles me when I post chapters and someone remarks that they missed this and they never understood that and suggest that maybe I should have done x or y. Usually, I go back, read slowly, and check the order and clarity of things. After I’ve done that a few times, and I’m content that all is as it should be, I comfort myself that the fault lies with the reader – especially if nobody else mentions the problem that particular reader pointed out.
.
Writers tend to be deep thinkers. Sometime we think too much. Yesterday, I read that there are many manic depressives among writers. That said, I’d rather rake through my storyline with a fine-tooth comb than believe right off the bat that my story isn’t working. With my temperament, next thing I know I’ll be wallowing in the doldrums. Maybe if half-a-dozen people tell me it isn’t, I might believe, but I’m not going to sacrifice my story because one person wanders over, has a read and can’t fathom what I’m doing.
.
I’m reviewing a novel on tbnw that I can’t make head or tail of; it’s kinda too high-brow for me. I’m a simple-minded gal, you see. However, I admitted up front to the writer that I didn’t have much of a clue as to what was going on. Some of the stuff, I do understand. Other things fly right over my head.
.
Better educated writers than I seem to have grasped the concept of the story, and that’s okay. I make my contribution in the grammar department – but I wouldn’t go out on a limb to offer advice on any of the speeches he’s written for his characters that are related to economics or the working class.
.
They might very well not be ’working’ for the novel, but what the heck do I know? I made a general comment that the book would have a very small niche market and the writer knew exactly what I meant. He agreed with me.
.
But I’m thinking about Tirz’s question…when you’re doing something new, how can you trust someone on plot?…my answer is that you can’t. If the writer doesn’t have all the answers, then it’s a good idea to get the book written before accepting any judgments on the work. At least when the story is done, there’s a solid lump of material that can be moulded to fit the author’s vision, or it can be rearranged at will.
.
I don’t think the middle of the process is the time to wonder if everything makes sense. Too many people do this, get discouraged and never finish. As with all my projects, I enjoy the journey, taking all the criticisms, compliments and the are-you-sure-you’re-allowed-to-do-that questions in stride.
.
The time to doubt myself is when I’ve gone into labour, squeezed out the baby, only to find it’s missing an arm, leg or some other vital body part. Even then, I don’t despair. Reconstructive surgery is always an option.
.
We writers are good at that.